After the Supreme Court declined to hear a plea alleging the arbitrary use of central agencies against opposition leaders, the Congress put on a brave face and claimed that the court had not made a determination regarding the merits of the case and that the parties were free to approach the court with new arguments and evidence.
Since the appeal was submitted jointly by 14 political groups, the Congress formally stated that it will make a statement after talking with other Opposition parties.The court’s permission for the parties to withdraw their case “at this stage,” according to prominent attorney and senior party leader Abhishek Singhvi, ensured that they could return to the court.
Anurag Thakur, a union minister, lashed out at the opposition parties for claiming that the government’s central investigative agencies had been misused. He claimed that while the corrupt tried to work together, the court revealed their true colours.
“All crooked individuals attempted to gather on one stage. The truth has now surfaced in court after they were exposed, the information and broadcasting minister told reporters.
TMC leader Derek O’Brien acknowledged the majesty of the Supreme Court in his acceptance of the ruling. On this matter, one possibility was to investigate a judicial alliance. That does not imply that there aren’t other topics on which to build a legal case.
Asaduddin Owaisi, the leader of AIMIM and a member of the Lok Sabha, called the Opposition’s action the “wrong method.” It was improper for the opposition parties to contact the Supreme Court. This is not how politics is conducted. You gave the BJP a platform to claim that what they were doing was lawful and that the Supreme Court had rejected the argument put up by the opposition. This kind of tactics cannot be used against the BJP, especially not when Narendra Modi is in charge. The choice followed the predicted course. You need to have taken action that would have had tangible effects; otherwise, the BJP would still be able to claim that the Supreme Court had ruled in its favour.